unremitting bleakness = panic

manhuntFirst of all, pull on your tight, black, leather gloves and have a sinister chuckle at our previous Manhunt post from 2004.

The unrepentant sequel, Manhunt 2 is due out in July. Hint: no gold-coin-collecting and princess-saving in this one either.

The real shocker this time is not the level of violence – predictably high – but the reaction of the BBFC, who have decided that only an outright ban is appropriate for the UK public.

No game at all. For anybody.

Bad puppy. As they say:

“Manhunt 2 is distinguishable from recent high-end video games by its unremitting bleakness and callousness of tone in an overall game context which constantly encourages visceral killing with exceptionally little alleviation or distancing”

Speaking personally, any game featuring – unforgettably – ‘unremitting bleakness’ is on my buy list. You can get some of Rockstar’s response, which is as rational as you might expect but will achieve little.

The first game to get an outright ban – ridiculously in retrospect – was Carmageddon, for the concept of reward for *chuckle* running over blind pedestrians. Back then in 1997, the publishers appealed, and actually overturned the ban.

That’s unlikely to happen in this case.

cleaverBut they can play it in the US, right?

In the US they have a classification, Adults Only (AO). The only game to get this rating to date is… GTA San Andreas. But only after the foot-shooting Hot Coffee debacle.

Unfortunately, while this classification makes sense, Sony and Nintendo have self-censored and made it their policy never to allow AO titles to run on their kit.

This is predictable from Nintendo (SNES Mortal Kombat), but Sony? Ouch.

Why god why?

But is it really more dangerous than the first game? Tim Smith presents more plausible reasons for the ban of a game which – very likely – is no more in need of censorship than the first:

  1. Fear of media response. The Daily Mail effect.
  2. Atonement. Simply ‘correcting for’ their leniency with MH1.

The point the BBFC is really making is that their classification system just doesn’t work, and that we need a further measure: PG, 12, 15, 18, outright ban.

And how many outright bans of books or films end up looking ridiculous after a short span of years?

All of them.