a scanner darkly

Philip K Dick is one of my favourite authors. More than anyone his novels are plumbed for screenplays, often to dire effect (Nicolas Cage in Next).

I recently finished The Man In The High Castle (birthday present, thank you) which I can unreservedly recommend. Major events (the Axis win the war) are presented in a low-key way, without heavy exposition, through the small lives of people. Complete with the classic Philip Dick reality-turned-on-its-head manoeuvres.

In this case no film is on the horizon, surprisingly (though my current read, the bonkers VALIS has the rights acquired).

scanner darklyInstead I recommend you see A Scanner Darkly.

Above all, this is a film true to Philip K Dick’s work. I mean all of his work, and not just the novel. It’s an armour-piercing bullet of paranoia.

Linklater uses the painterly visual effect throughout the film. However the look isn’t just sparkly eye biscuits, as he previously used to lighten the stodgy philosophy of Waking Life. Here, the effect is crucial.

  1. This is a film where almost every character is constantly on drugs. Bad, paranoid drugs. The view shifts and slips uncertainly, without relief. The whole world is always on the verge of sliding off the edge of normality and into something unexpected and frightening.
  2. The ‘scramble suit’, a kind of shifting camouflage. The visual effects here actually make it convincing.

The themes of identity loss, and confusion around what is real are executed skillfully.

I think it’s a film that actually evokes the exhiliration of simply pushing yourself so far out of yourself that your senses are completely subsumed. To break the barrier between conscious and subconscious.

My main criticism is that by the end, very little uncertainty remains. Loose ends are tied.

If only Lynch had done it. Still, a great, underrated film.